学术界对于乾嘉考据学派的争论旷日持久,主要围绕吴派、皖派、扬州学派的派系问题,莫衰一是。本文从具体的文献材料出发,认为:学派的划分,若为便于地域文化研究则有益,若注目在树门立派上则有失。戴震与惠栋皆以探求古圣贤之道为目的,虽有求古与求是之别,但舍古无以求是;而扬州诸儒的学术成就,只是戴学在扬州地域得到更广泛的传播和阐扬而已;并且戴震的学术影响所及更为广远,至今犹有余风。 Academics for the Qianjia textual criticism of the protracted debate, mainly around the Wu school, Anhui school, Yangzhou school faction issues, one after another. Based on the concrete literature and material, this paper argues that if the school division is beneficial for the study of the regional culture, it will be lost if the focus is on the school. Dai Zhen and Huidong both seek the path of the ancient sage, although there is a difference between the ancient and the seeking, but the ancient one did not ask for it; and the academic achievements of all the Confucianism in Yangzhou were only obtained in the Yangzhou area. Dissemination and play it; and Dai Zhen’s academic influence and more far, there is still plenty of wind.