自20世纪60年代以来,学界普遍对民族志的真实性产生质疑。在创作过程中受权力、语境、修辞、知识局限以及世界体系与经验文本等方面的影响,民族志著作存在不科学性。人类学家开始对民族志的失真进行反思。《写文化——民族志的诗学与政治学》的出版是反思思潮的标志性成果。笔者就民族志写作展开论述,并提出民族志的叙述需要从多维度,多视角出发,借鉴现代学科的发展,丰富民族志的写作方法。对民族志叙述方法的反思,在本质上是人类学学科的进步,也是人文学科的普遍发展。 Since the 1960s, academic circles have generally questioned the authenticity of ethnography. Influenced by the power, the context, the rhetoric, the limitation of knowledge, the world system and the experience text in the process of creation, ethnographic works are unscientific. Anthropologists begin to reflect on the ethnographic distortion. The publication of “Writing Culture - Poetics and Politics of Ethnography” is a landmark achievement of the ideological trend of reflection. The author discusses the writing of ethnography and argues that narration of ethnography needs to enrich the ethnography writing from the perspectives of multidimensional and multidimensional perspectives and learn from the development of modern science. Reflections on ethnographic narratives are, in essence, advances in anthropological subjects and universal humanities.