在一次学习吴天祥事迹的讨论会上,他的“级别”引起了大家争议:有说是科级的,也有说是副处级的。本来,学习吴天祥的模范事迹,“级别”并不重要,然而,大家的争论倒也引起笔者的一番思考。 毋庸讳言,时下在我国,“级别”仍不可小视。一方面,“级别”高低常常成为人们评价干部德才优劣、成就大小的准绳;相应地,也就有人把“升官”作为功成名就、事业腾达的人生目标。这固然是旧社会官本位体制之遗风, At a seminar on the study of Wu Tianxiang’s deeds, his “level” caused controversy: it was said to be a section-level or deputy departmental level. Originally, study of Wu Tianxiang’s exemplary deeds, “level” is not important, however, everyone’s controversy actually caused a lot of thinking. Needless to say, nowadays in our country, the “level” can not be underestimated. On the one hand, the level of “level” is often the yardstick for people to evaluate the merits and demerits of cadres in their moral qualities and accomplishments; accordingly, some people regard “promotion of officials” as the goal of life and the goal of career. This is, of course, the legacy of the old system of social class officials.