我们认为,现行高考分类、设科和计分,既有分类过“粗”不利于大学选才的问题,也有科目多而不全不利于中学育才的问题,但最主要的弊病就是一个,即学生负担重又知识缺漏,影响了学生独立获取知识和创造性运用所学知识的能力的健康发展,不利于培养适应“三个面向”要求的创造型人才。面对高考分类、科目设置、计分方法存在的弊端,如何进行改革?分类是“粗”好还是“细”好?设科宜少还是宜多?我们在座谈讨论和向各界征求意见的过程中,多数同志倾向于在高中毕业会考的基础上再进行高校入学考试。高 In our opinion, the current classification of college entrance examination, setting subjects and scoring, both the classification of “rough” is not conducive to the selection of university talent, but also many subjects are not conducive to secondary school education, but the most important drawback is that one, that is, students Unnecessary burdens of knowledge and lack of knowledge have affected the healthy development of students’ ability to independently acquire knowledge and creatively use the knowledge they have learned, which is not conducive to the training of creative talents who adapt to the “three-oriented” requirements. Facing the college entrance examination classification, subjects set, scoring methods exist shortcomings, how to carry out the reform? Classification is “rough” or “fine” good? Should set should be less or more appropriate? We are discussing and soliciting opinions from all walks of life Most comrades tend to conduct college entrance exams on the basis of their final high school examinations. high