本文将《“禽”字新释》之“禽”释“制”(制服 )的唯一论据的书证之误作了正补 ;并将其全部 5个“上举例句”之禽 ,分别作了当释为“杀”、“灭”与“破”的商榷 ;还将其援例以为“《战国策·齐策》言‘系梁太子申 ,禽庞涓’”“是与太史公所记一致的”作了商榷 ,确认魏太子申和庞涓皆死于桂陵之战 ,而没有误分出来的齐魏马陵之战 This article misinterprets the documentary evidence of the only argument for the new interpretation of the “bird” system of “poultry” (uniforms), and makes a full revision of the documentary evidence of all the five “exemplifying sentences” When the interpretation of “kill”, “destroy” and “broken” of the discussion; but also to its case that “” Warring States policy Qi “words” Department of Liang Taizishen, Pang Juan Juan “” is consistent with the Taishishi Gong " Made a discussion, confirmed Wei Taizishen and Pang Juan died in the battle of Guiling, without misinterpreting the battle of Qi Wei Maling