论文部分内容阅读
本文对东山文化的年代、青铜冶铸技术以及分布格局,在梳理前人的基础上,提出了若干新看法,以为东山文化的上限当不早于以万家坝为代表墓葬的年代;冶金学的研究也说明东山文化所生产形态较为“规整”的铜兵器中,部分并不存在任何再加工痕迹,为专用于墓葬的“明器”可能性相当高,且这种大量生产规整“铜明器”的作风也见于滇文化区域中。笔者指出,东山文化虽然与滇文化的社会在多层面上具有相似性,但两者应是当时的中心之一,彼此间保持着一定的独立性,但青铜技术和意识形态在这些中心间也可能较为自由地传播。
This paper puts forward some new views on the age of Dongshan culture, bronze smelting technology and distribution pattern, based on the review of predecessors, that the upper limit of Dongshan culture should not be earlier than that of the one represented by Wanjiaba; the metallurgy Study also shows that the Dongshan culture produced more “regular” copper weapons, some does not exist any traces of reprocessing, dedicated to the burial “Ming ” is very high probability, and this mass production Regularity “Bronze ” style also found in the Dian cultural area. The author points out that although the Dongshan culture has similarities with the Dian culture at many levels, both of them should be one of the focal points at the time, maintaining a certain degree of independence from each other. However, the bronze technique and ideology May be more freely spread.