论文部分内容阅读
案情:2001年11月某日午后,劳某某相约女青年某某到某市某农场的鱼塘钓鱼。在调换钓鱼位置时,因没有收拢的碳素鱼杆碰到了10KV高压电线,劳某某被击倒,抢救无效死亡。其家属于2002年5月向当地人民法院起诉,将某市某某监狱(该10KV专用高压线路的所有者、使用者)、某市供电局、该鱼塘的承包人列为被告。在法庭第一次开庭后,又追加了某市农场(该鱼塘的出租人)为被告。判决:经法院两次开庭审理后,法院判决:“本案首先宜适用高度危险作业致人损害的民事赔偿责任的有关法律规定”。“被告某市监狱作为该高压线路的消费者,对死者劳某某触电事故的发生并无责任,原告要求被告某监狱进行赔偿,无法律依据,本院不予
Case: In November 2001 on the afternoon of a certain day, a certain young woman named Lao Moumou went fishing at a fish pond in a farm in a certain city. In the exchange of fishing position, because there is no confiscation of carbon rod hit 10KV high-voltage electric wire, Lao Moumou was knocked down, died of invalid rescue. His family members filed a lawsuit in the local people’s court in May 2002, listing the prison in a certain city (the owner and user of the 10KV dedicated high-voltage line), the city power supply bureau, and the contractor of the fish pond as the defendant. After the first court hearing, an additional farm (the lessor of the fish pond) was added as the defendant. The verdict: After two court hearings, the court ruled: ”This case should first be applicable to the civil liability for damages caused by highly dangerous operations“. ”Defendant City Prisons as consumers of the high-voltage lines, the death of Lao Moumou electric shock accident does not take any responsibility, the plaintiff requested a defendant in a prison for compensation, no legal basis, the court will not