“兰亭聚讼”最关键的问题应该是:传下来的《兰亭序》帖,其文、其书是否真正或完全出自王羲之笔下?对此,清代以前也有学者由不解、生疑直至明确否定。只是由于缺乏有力的实证资料(主要是晋代碑志出土较少)和其他多种原因,言者甚少,影响甚微。直至20世纪60年代中期,经由郭沫若发难,毛泽东过问,才在全国学术界掀起一场规模空前、影响深广的关于《兰亭序》帖作者真伪的大论辩。 “Lanting court proceedings ” the most critical question should be: the pass down the “Lanting Pavilion” posts, the text, the book is really or completely from Wang Xizhi’s writings? In this regard, before the Qing Dynasty, some scholars puzzled, suspicious Until explicitly rejected. Only because of the lack of strong empirical data (mainly the unearthed tablets of the Jin dynasty) and a variety of other reasons, very few speakers have little effect. Until the mid 1960s, after Guo Mouru attacked and Mao Zedong made an inquiry, he started a grand debate on the authenticity of the authors of the “Lanting Preface” in the academic circles in the country with unprecedented scale and profound influence.