党的十一届三中全会以来,特别是治理整顿以后,国家对我国产业结构调整问题十分重视,也进行过几次较大调整,在一定程度上促进了资源配置效率的提高和宏观经济效益的增长.但是,不可否认的是,长期以来,由于我们在经济工作的实践中,未能把提高经济效益与产业结构调整工作很好地统一起来;有时从社会稳定方面的考虑,使许多经过实践验证卓有成效,并具有全面推广价值的产业结构调整方案不得不搁置或延缓下来.特别是采取’一刀切’的工作方法不加区别,以至贻误一些结构调整的时机.这既没有使经济效益得到提高,社会有效供给有所增加, Since the Third Plenary Session of the Eleventh Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, especially after the rectification and reform, the state attaches great importance to the readjustment of China’s industrial structure and has made some major adjustments. This has, to some extent, promoted the improvement of resource allocation efficiency and macroeconomic benefits However, it is undeniable that, for a long time, due to our economic practice, we have failed to unite economic improvement with the readjustment of industrial structure. Sometimes social stability has led many to pass Practical measures have proved effective and have a comprehensive promotion of industrial restructuring programs have to be shelved or postponed .Especially to adopt a “one size fits all” working methods without distinction, as well as derailing some of the timing of structural adjustment .This has neither improved economic efficiency , Effective social supply has increased,