论文部分内容阅读
For many of us， chicken soup can soothe the soul and mac and cheese can erase a bad day. We eat chocolate when we feel gloomy. And we eat chocolate ice cream to help us get over a bad breakup.
These comfort foods usually aren’t so good for our arteries， but we tend to think they have healing effects—that they’re the cure for all our emotional problems.
But maybe they’re not， says Traci Mann， a professor of psychology at the University of Minnesota. In a recent study， Mann and some colleagues put 100 college students in a bad mood by making them watch clips from sad movies. They then fed half the students their favorite comfort food， while the other students ate food they enjoyed， but wouldn’t consider comfort food.
Once the students had finished eating， the researchers asked the students how they felt. It turns out that all the students felt better， regardless of what they had eaten.
“That is not what we expected，” Mann says. “We kept repeating the study， because we didn’t believe it.”
In another experiment， Mann had half the kids eat comfort food， and the other half eat nothing. After a few minutes， both groups felt equally better. The comfort food had no effect on their mood.
The results of these experiments appeared in Health Psychology. “People are taking this very hard，” Mann says. “I guess it removes a very handy justification people have for eating comfort food.”
Of course， the study has a few significant limitations. For one， it only looked at a particular kind of negative mood—caused by watching sad films. Other studies have come to different conclusions. For example， one in 2011， published in the journal Psychological Science， suggested that eating chicken soup may help some people feel less lonely.
And the researchers didn’t look at the reallife situations in which people eat comfort foods. “Maybe the comfort from comfort food comes from going to a cafe acquiring it，” Mann says. The research on the psychological effects of comfort food is not very thorough， she notes， so we don’t have any definite answers yet.
David Levitsky， a professor of nutrition at Cornell University， says Mann’s research is in line with what he would have expected. “We tend to look for a magic solution to our problems，” Levitsky says.
The idea that we can feel better by simply eating certain foods is very appealing， he says， “but in actuality， feeling better has nothing to do with the food itself， and it’s a very weak psychological effect.” The comfort foods we turn to the most are the ones we ate while growing up， or the ones that remind us of celebrations， Levitsky says. We may associate chicken soup with all those times Mom took care of us when we were little， and maybe mashed potatoes remind us of joyful Thanksgivings.
Remember that scene from the movie Ratatouille， when an angry food critic tastes a meal that makes him feel like a kid again？
We think that eating foods that remind us of home， or of good times， will make us feel better when we’re down， Levitsky says. “But we don’t know if it’s performing the function that people want it to.”
So does this mean we should step away from the Ben
These comfort foods usually aren’t so good for our arteries， but we tend to think they have healing effects—that they’re the cure for all our emotional problems.
But maybe they’re not， says Traci Mann， a professor of psychology at the University of Minnesota. In a recent study， Mann and some colleagues put 100 college students in a bad mood by making them watch clips from sad movies. They then fed half the students their favorite comfort food， while the other students ate food they enjoyed， but wouldn’t consider comfort food.
Once the students had finished eating， the researchers asked the students how they felt. It turns out that all the students felt better， regardless of what they had eaten.
“That is not what we expected，” Mann says. “We kept repeating the study， because we didn’t believe it.”
In another experiment， Mann had half the kids eat comfort food， and the other half eat nothing. After a few minutes， both groups felt equally better. The comfort food had no effect on their mood.
The results of these experiments appeared in Health Psychology. “People are taking this very hard，” Mann says. “I guess it removes a very handy justification people have for eating comfort food.”
Of course， the study has a few significant limitations. For one， it only looked at a particular kind of negative mood—caused by watching sad films. Other studies have come to different conclusions. For example， one in 2011， published in the journal Psychological Science， suggested that eating chicken soup may help some people feel less lonely.
And the researchers didn’t look at the reallife situations in which people eat comfort foods. “Maybe the comfort from comfort food comes from going to a cafe acquiring it，” Mann says. The research on the psychological effects of comfort food is not very thorough， she notes， so we don’t have any definite answers yet.
David Levitsky， a professor of nutrition at Cornell University， says Mann’s research is in line with what he would have expected. “We tend to look for a magic solution to our problems，” Levitsky says.
The idea that we can feel better by simply eating certain foods is very appealing， he says， “but in actuality， feeling better has nothing to do with the food itself， and it’s a very weak psychological effect.” The comfort foods we turn to the most are the ones we ate while growing up， or the ones that remind us of celebrations， Levitsky says. We may associate chicken soup with all those times Mom took care of us when we were little， and maybe mashed potatoes remind us of joyful Thanksgivings.
Remember that scene from the movie Ratatouille， when an angry food critic tastes a meal that makes him feel like a kid again？
We think that eating foods that remind us of home， or of good times， will make us feel better when we’re down， Levitsky says. “But we don’t know if it’s performing the function that people want it to.”
So does this mean we should step away from the Ben