论文部分内容阅读
东南亚青铜时代的断代以及它与中国古代文明的关系尚处在争议当中,目前主要有两种观点,一种观点基于泰国东北部班农瓦遗址的75个放射性碳元素数据,把东南亚青铜时代的开始年代划定在公元前1000年,发掘者认为该地区青铜器生产技术源自与商以及长江流域及岭南地区之间的贸易交流;而另外一种观点的倡导者White则基于同属于泰国东北部的班清遗址的9个放射性碳元素数据,认为东南亚青铜时代始于公元前2000年前后,其源头并非中原地区或长江流域而是在更为遥远的甘肃地区。本文在讨论White断代方法的纰漏基础上,提出结合商代和西周文化对东南亚地区青铜时代断代的合理性。
The dating of the Southeast Asian Bronze Age and its relationship with ancient civilizations in China are still in dispute. There are currently two main views. One is based on 75 radiometric carbon data from the Banongwa site in northeastern Asia, Beginning of the Chronology In 1000 BC, excavators considered the bronze production technology in the region as having originated from trade exchanges with merchants and the Yangtze River valley and the Lingnan region. White, an advocate of another view, Of the 9 sites of radiocarbons on the Bancun site. It is believed that the Southeast Asian Bronze Age began around 2000 BC and originated not from the Central Plains or the Yangtze River but from the more distant Gansu. On the basis of discussing the flaws of the White dating method, this paper puts forward the rationality of the dating of the Bronze Age in Southeast Asia based on Shang and Western Zhou culture.