比较票据无权代理与票据伪造就能发现这两者之间具有形式上的差异却又有实质上的一致,故对其存在的异同点,尤以构成要件、追认的可否、责任内容三个角度进行彻底检证、全面比较,兼具理论和实践双重意义。在完成上述三项对比研究的基础上,最后通过中日票据理论比较方法、以理论创新的视角尝试在票据无权代理的法律制度上寻找票据伪造人承担票据责任的突破口。 Comparing bills with counterfeit agents and counterfeits can be found in a formal difference between these two but there is a substantive agreement, so the similarities and differences of their existence, especially the constitutional requirements, the ratification of the responsibility, the content of responsibility of three From the perspective of thorough verification, a comprehensive comparison, both the theory and practice of dual significance. Based on the completion of the above three comparative studies, this paper attempts to find a breakthrough in the legal system of counterfeiters’ commitment to negotiable instruments through the comparison of Sino-Japanese paper theory and the theoretical innovation.