《史记·龟策列传》记载:“略闻夏殷欲卜者,乃取蓍龟,已则弃去之,以为龟藏则不灵,蓍久则不神。至周室之卜官,常宝藏蓍龟。”对此,古人曾深信不疑,而近人亦颇以为然。然而,随着近代考古事业的飞速发展,史前至殷、周甲骨埋藏的实例不断增多,使学术界对《史记》关于“殷弃周藏”之说产生了极大怀疑,以致完全有理由予以订正。首先根据考古遗存的实例提出质疑的是陕西省周原考古队。70年代后半叶,在周原岐山的早周故地,发现大量卜用甲骨,有字与无字共存。周原考古队发现,在扶风齐家出土的甲骨,都是散见于几个灰坑,有的一坑出5件,有的一坑出3件,且与残损的 Records of the Historian · Turtle Cemetery records: “slightly summer Xiayin Bu those who take turtles turtle, it has been abandoned to that turtle possession is not working, Achilles tendon not to god. Often treasures of the Yarrow’s tortoise. ”“ In this regard, the ancients had no doubt, and the recent people also quite agree. However, with the rapid development of modern archeology, there are an increasing number of instances of prehistoric bury from Yin and Zhou dynasties, which has caused great doubt among the historians about the theory of ”abandoning the Zhou dynasty" Revised. First of all, based on the archaeological remains of the case questioned the archeology team of Zhouyuan in Shaanxi Province. In the second half of the seventies, in the early Zhou ancestral Qishan Zhou area, found a large number of BU with oracle bone, word and word without coexistence. Zhou Yuan archeology team found that the bones unearthed in the Fu Qi all are scattered in a few gray pits, and some pit out of 5, and some pit out of 3, and with the damaged