论文部分内容阅读
怀特和汉密尔顿根据泰国东北部班清遗址的7个AMS14C年代数据,提出了一个东南亚青铜时代的起源模式,将青铜时代早期的年代断定在公元前2千纪。如果将青铜产业追溯至公元前2千纪东南亚与中国中原王国的交流,年代似乎太早,因此他们认为位于乌拉尔山脉与阿尔泰山之间公元前3千纪的塞伊马-图宾诺冶金技术为东南亚青铜技术的来源。为了挑战这个理论,我们建立起一个新的班清遗址的年代框架,进而提出我们的模式,即通过与黄河、长江河谷的王国接触,青铜冶炼技术的相关知识在公元前2千纪后期才到达东南亚地区。
Based on the seven AMS14C dating data from the Banchean site in northeastern Thailand, White and Hamilton proposed an origin pattern of the Southeast Asian Bronze Age, dating from the early Bronze Age to 2,000 BC. If it seems too early for the bronze industry to be dated back to 2000 BC when the exchanges between Southeast Asia and the Central Plains Kingdom of China started so early, they believed that Seymad Tumbolin’s metallurgical technology between the Urals and Altai mountains The source of bronze technology in Southeast Asia. In order to challenge this theory, we set up a new framework of the era of the Bancheng ruins, and then put forward our model, that is, through contact with the kingdoms of the Yellow River and the Yangtze River valley, the relevant knowledge of the bronze smelting technology did not arrive until the second millennium BC South East Asia.