论文部分内容阅读
从逻辑经验主义到社会建构的发展中,自然的历史性始终未能进入研究者的视野。“认识论的鸡”之争使拉图尔提出了广义对称性原则,这一原则使自然的历史性以一种全新的面貌再现,使STS走向了新自然辩证法的本体论研究,这种本体论表明客体之所以能成为“科学”的,是因为它是在辩证的实践过程中生成的;客观性与真理等一系列认识论范畴也不是对预先存在对象的表象性反映,也是在历史与时间进程中生成的东西;科学是一个人与物、自然与社会共同进化的过程。
From the development of logical empiricism to the construction of society, the historical nature has not been able to enter the field of vision of researchers. “Epistemological Chickens ” made Latour put forward the principle of general symmetry. This principle made the history of nature reappear in a completely new appearance, and made STS move to the ontological study of neo-natural dialectics The ontology shows that the reason why the object can become “scientific” is that it is generated during the process of dialectical practice. A series of epistemological categories such as objectivity and truth are not an image reflection of the pre-existing object, History and time generated by the process of things; science is a process of co-evolution of man and things, nature and society.