人民网杭州7月13日专电(记者袁亚平)记者今天下午从杭州娃哈哈集团获悉,瑞典斯德哥尔摩商会仲裁庭驳回达能提出的对娃哈哈采取临时措施的请求。7月11日,瑞典斯德哥尔摩商会仲裁庭颁布了第七号程序令,对申请人的《临时措施申请》作出决定。在该决定中,仲裁庭认为:1.仲裁庭已经了解到当事人所面临的挑战以及他们之间的争议所涉及的经济、法律和文化背景。仲裁庭意识到,本案争议是复杂的,而且所涉及的法律问题是困难的。2.根据瑞典法律,临时措施的准许除需具备其他条件外,还必须证明存在紧急性和不可弥补的损害。3.紧急性是一个相对的概念。比如,申请 Hangzhou, July 13 (Reporter Yuan Yaping) A reporter learned from Hangzhou Wahaha Group this afternoon that Sweden’s Stockholm Chamber of Commerce arbitration tribunal rejected Danone’s request for provisional measures against Wahaha. On July 11, the Arbitral Tribunal of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce in Sweden issued Order No. 7, deciding on the applicant’s “provisional application”. In that decision, the arbitral tribunal held that: 1. The arbitral tribunal had learned about the challenges faced by the parties and the economic, legal and cultural context involved in the dispute between them. The arbitral tribunal realized that the dispute in this case was complicated and that the legal issues involved were difficult. 2. According to Swedish law, the granting of an interim measure must prove, in addition to other conditions, the existence of urgent and irreparable damage. 3. Urgency is a relative concept. For example, apply