商业秘密作为知识产权的重要种类,在立法中受到越来越多的关注。关于侵犯商业秘密罪的犯罪主观方面,学界多有争议。从立法科学和立法技术出发,应该否定存在过失侵犯商业秘密罪。而对于第三人侵犯商业秘密行为的主观要件中的“明知或应知”的认定,则是综合各种客观事实的一种诉讼证明手段。 As an important category of intellectual property, trade secrets receive more and more attention in the legislation. On the subjective aspects of the crime of infringing trade secrets, there is much controversy in the academic circle. Proceeding from the legislative, scientific and legislative techniques, it should be negated the crime of negligence of trade secrets. However, the cognizance of “knowing or knowing” in the subjective elements of the third party’s violation of trade secrets is a kind of lawsuit proving method combining all kinds of objective facts.