Analysis of Humor in the Dialogues of The Big Bang Theory

来源 :校园英语·中旬 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:qiaobianhongyaogqw
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
  Part One Introduction
  In 1967,Herbert Paul Grice first proposed the notion of “Cooperative Principle”.He claimed that both parts should stick to a series of principles in order to achieve successful communication.(He Ziran,Chen Xinren,2004).But sometimes,people violate them and there comes the conversational implicature,which is the origin of humor.People have done researches discussing the relationship between “Cooperative Principle” and humor,and it is necessary to see how humor is produced and by this analysis,new light will be shed upon the application of this principle in real life.This thesis is going to analyze dialogues in The Big Bang Theory by using the “Cooperative Principle” to show how humor is achieved.
  Part Two Theoretical Framework
  Four maxims are as follows:
  Quantity
  1.Make your contribution as informative as is required (for the current purposes of the exchange).
  2.Do not make your contribution more informative than is required.
  Quality
  Try to make your contribution one that is true.
  1.Do not say what you believe to be false.
  2.Do not say that for which you lack adequate evidence.
  Relation
  Be relevant.
  Manner
  Be perspicuous.
  1.Avoid obscurity of expression.
  2.Avoid ambiguity.
  3.Be brief.
  4.Be orderly.
  Part Three Case Analysis
  Example 1
  Leonard: I should probably give you a heads-up about his mother.
  Penny: What about her?
  Leonard: She’s a delightful woman.You’ 11 love her.
  Analysis:This dialogue took place when Penny was persuaded by Lenard to apologize to Howard at his home.Since Lenard knows very well that Howard’s mother is loud and annoying,in case Penny changes her mind,he only gives her a little message.Thus,when Penny finds out,she takes it with a big surprise and then comes the humorous effect.
  Example 2
  Penny: How come you didn’t go in to work today?
  Sheldon: I’m taking a sabbatical because I won’t kowtow to mediocre minds.
  Analysis: When Penny asked why Sheldon didn’t go to work,Sheldon didn’t tell her directly that he was fired.By giving false information,Sheldon violates the maxim of quality.However,it helps to build his lofty image,and leads people to laugh.
  Example 3
  Lenard: Well,what did she mean by that? Was that just a generic platitude or was that a subtle bid for attention?
  Sheldon: You know why this hamburger surpasses the Big Boy? This is a single-decker,whereas the Big Boy is a double-decker.This has a much more satisfying meat-to-bun-to-condiment ratio.   Analysis: Lenard isn’t sure about what Penny has said: whether she is comforting him for politeness or she is drawing his attention in an undetectable way.So he turns to Sheldon for help who doesn’t answer directly,but gives an answer that has nothing to do with the question at all.It reflects Sheldon’s decision of not discussing problems in Lenard’s affection life.
  Example 4
  Lenard: Can you tell I’m perspiring a little?
  Sheldon: No.The dark crescent-shaped patterns under you arms conceal it nicely.
  Analysis: On the first date with Penny,Lenard is so nervous that his sweat has soaked out.He asks Sheldon whether he can tell he’s been sweating.Though he has noticed the marks made by sweating Sheldon says he can’t see it because the “dark patterns conceal it nicely”.His answer not only violates the maxim of manner,but also the maxim of quality.
  Part Four Conclusion
  Under the guidance of the theories,this thesis analyzes the conversational implicature and the humor it brings about so as to help audiences to better understand the inner world of characters and the humor.It also helps English learners to get a better grasp of the Cooperative Principle.However,due to the limitation of time and resources,examples and the corpus might not be adequate.Thus for further researches,more pragmatic theories can be applied to analyze literature works and TV programs.
  Reference:
  [1]何自然, 陈新仁.当代语用学[M].北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2004.
其他文献
【摘要】误区是学习效果的瓶颈,在传统的英语学习中,这样的误区比较突出,如何走出误区,探索新的学习方法,是提高学习效果的关键。本文从误区的提出以及针对误区进行新方法探索两方面进行阐述,并以语篇词汇学习为突破,实现学习模式探索的实践性。  【关键词】突破误区 能动性 游戏 多媒体  一、小学英语教学的误区  在小学低年级英语教学中,现在延续的教学方法有很多并不适合整个英语学习的发展,甚至与年龄特征不符
【摘要】英语的地位不言而喻,然而,由于种种原因,高中阶段英语学困生日益增多,他们的存在不仅妨碍了提高学生全面素质目标的实现,也严重地困扰着国家教育的发展。如何才能转化英语学困生已成为广大英语教师非常关注,也是一个势在必行的研究课题。本文讨论给出关爱学生,激发动机、培养兴趣,确立目标、优化课堂,因材施教、多元评价,关注过程四种可行策略。  【关键词】高中英语 学困生 转化策略  在中学英语课程标准中
【摘要】言语幽默是一种别具一格的语言交际艺术,是一种重要的幽默形式。本文以美国情景喜剧《生活大爆炸》为实例,从合作原则视角下言语幽默的四个基本准则入手,深刻分析双方会话过程中因违反量的准则、质的准则、关系准则以及方式准则而产生的幽默效果,因而更为全面、系统的对幽默言语的语用认知进行探究。  【关键词】合作原则 言语幽默 《生活大爆炸》  一、《生活大爆炸》(The Big Bang Theory)
【Abstract】This paper analyzes the influence of rural education on social stratification and social mobility for rural students and reveals the hazards and influence of distrusting educational system o
小学英语课堂教学是一门重要的艺术,要大幅度提高小学英语教学质量,则需要运用一定的英语教学方法。当前,小学英语教学方法是多种多样的,但是教学效果是不尽相同的。笔者近年来在小学英语教学过程中喜欢采用合作教学法,引导学生积极参与英语教学中,培养学生合作探究的意识,进而提升小学英语教学质量。  一、运用合作学习法,教学内容选择要恰当  合作教学运用恰当,可以提升小学英语教学效果。在合作教学内容的选择上,必
【摘要】中考是义务教育阶段的终结性考试,其结果既是衡量学生是否达到毕业标准的主要依据,也是高中阶段学校招生的重要依据之一,而中考英语又是其中至关重要一环。如何提高复习课的实效性,从三个方面入手:一、复习课预习工作的重视,二、复习课课堂模式的转变,三、复习课习题有效性的提高。  【关键词】初三英语 复习课  复习课是整个学习活动中十分重要的一个环节,是对学生已有的知识进行回顾、总结。内容是已经学习过
【Abstract】In a rapid social transformation times, more and more social problems come to existence in Chinese villages, which results in instability in the society. By using the collective consciousnes
上课铃响了,我微笑着走进教室。师生互相问候完毕,学生在静静地等候新课的开始。面对四十多双期待的眼睛,我问道:Do you like animals? What’s your favorite animal?学生们一听,便迅速举起了手,抢着回答。课堂氛围相当热烈。我心想看来学生对此话题十分感兴趣,便灵机一动,心想英语新课程标准不就是强调要把课堂还给学生吗?我何不就此尝试一次呢。于是,我说道:Now,
【摘要】人在实际生活中所表现出来的智能是多种多样的,当然智能具有差异性,它包括个体间差异,同时也包括个体内部的差异,专业人士指出人的智能可以通过后天的培养得到开发和逐步加强,本文以多元智力理论为基础,探讨它对长春师范大学双语师资培养英语教学的指导意义及融合。  【关键词】多元智能理论 研究  多元智力理论是加德纳教授在研究了各种对象的人脑与智力的基础上提出的,它的提出与发展对语言教学产生了重大的影
【Abstract】Joseph Conrad is an important modernist writer at the turn of the 20th century whose work Heart of Darkness has earned him great fame as well as criticism. Heart of Darkness is welcomed for