论文部分内容阅读
新民事诉讼法在第五十六条增加了第三款,该款引入了一个可简称为“第三人撤销之诉”的诉讼新种类。通过修改,将未能参加诉讼而在事后起诉的第三人的范围扩大了,即无论是有独立请求权的第三人还是无独立请求权的第三人,均可请求改变或撤销已经发生效力的判决、裁定或调解书。1本文分析了第三人撤销之诉在适用上的困境,并提出相应的解决建议,对进一步推动该制度的研究有积极的意义。
The new Civil Procedure Law adds the third paragraph to Article 56, which introduces a new category of litigation which may be referred to as “the third party revokes”. By amendment, the scope of the third party who is prosecuted after the fact as a consequence of failure to participate in the proceedings is expanded, ie, either a third party with independent claims or a third party without independent claims may request that the change or withdrawal be made Judgment, ruling or conciliation. 1 This paper analyzes the dilemma of the application of the third party’s revocation complaint and puts forward corresponding solutions to the proposal, which is of positive significance for the further promotion of the system’s research.