论文部分内容阅读
’94全国诉讼法学研讨会(年会),由中国法学 会诉讼法学研究会和武汉市中级人民法院于1994年10月31日至11月5日在武汉市联合召开,会议的主题是“刑事诉讼法的修改和完善”。出席会议的代表85人,其中检察系统的代表有16人,最高人民检察院刑检厅厅长张风阁、中国检察学会副秘书长董春江副研究员参加了会议。会上检察系统的代表和部分从事检察学理论研究的专家、学者就刑事诉讼法修改中涉及检察权的几个问题提出了许多意见和建议,现将代表们的主要观点综述如下。 一、关于检察机关的侦查权 诉讼法学界和司法实务界对此有不同认识,主要有以下四种观点:第一种认为应当取消检察机关的侦查权。理由是:检察机关是国家的法律监督机关,应以
’94 The National Symposium on Procedural Law (Annual Conference), jointly organized by the Law Society of China Lawsuit Society and the Wuhan Intermediate People’s Court, was held in Wuhan City from October 31 to November 5, 1994, and the theme of the conference was “Criminal Amendment and improvement of procedural law. ” There were 85 delegates attending the meeting, of whom 16 were representatives of the procuratorial system, Zhang Fengge, director of the Criminal Prosecution Office of the Supreme People’s Procuratorate, and Dong Chunjiang, deputy secretary general of the Chinese Prosecution Association, attended the meeting. Representatives of the procuratorial system and some experts and scholars engaged in the study of procuratorial theory put forward many opinions and suggestions on several issues concerning prosecutorial power in the revision of the criminal procedure law. The main points of view of delegates are summarized as follows. First, on the prosecutor’s investigative power The litigation jurisprudence and judicial practice have different understanding of this, mainly in the following four points: First, the procuratorial organ should consider the lifting of the investigative power. The reason is that procuratorial organs are the legal supervision organs of the state and should be used