对于高考试题的科学分析,不仅有利于我们把握试题特点及其导向,从而改进我们的教学;而且有利于改进高考的命题,从而修正其导向,提高命题的质量。 近年来,很多分析文章,就是这样做的,它们使中学师生,乃至命题的专家们获益匪浅。 然而,在某些文章中,常常会出现某些新颖、令人关注的、有影响的提法。这些提法,有的可能是概括不准,有的提法上不无片面之处,有的甚至产生某种误导。本文拟就某些提法,发表一孔之见,供参考与批评 Scientific analysis of high test questions not only helps us to grasp the characteristics of the questions and their orientation, thereby improving our teaching; it is also conducive to improving the propositions of the college entrance examination, thus correcting its orientation and improving the quality of the propositions. In recent years, many analytical articles have done just that. They have benefited teachers and students in middle schools, and even propositional experts. However, in some articles, there are often some novel, interesting, and influential references. Some of these mentions may be inaccurate. Some references are not one-sided, and some may even be misleading. This article proposes to give an opinion on some of the references for reference and criticism