论文部分内容阅读
为了解科技期刊专家审稿质量的影响因素,以期为编辑遴选优秀审稿专家提供依据,选取《广东医学院学报》160篇论文送予89名专家进行审稿,并以问卷形式对审稿质量的影响因素进行调查分析。结果发现:教授与副教授的审稿率、审稿时间和审稿质量差异无统计学意义;40岁以下专家的稿件审回率最高且审稿质量最好;60岁以上专家的审回率则最低,但其审稿时间亦最短,且其审稿质量仅次于40岁以下的专家;审稿方式、审稿制度、个人素质、审稿人身体状况和审稿心理均是影响专家审稿质量的因素。建议编辑在遴选审稿人时应根据稿件的实际情况并结合专家的特点合理安排。
In order to understand the influencing factors of sci-tech periodical reviewers’ quality, in order to provide a basis for editors to select excellent reviewers, select 160 articles of “Journal of Guangdong Medical College” for 89 experts to review the draft, The influencing factors were investigated and analyzed. The results showed that there was no significant difference between the professors and associate professors in terms of manuscript review time, manuscript review time and manuscript review quality; those under 40 years old had the highest manuscript review rate and the best manuscript review quality; But its manuscript review time is the shortest, and the quality of manuscript review is second only to the experts under 40 years old. Reviewing manuscripts, reviewing manuscripts, personal qualities, referees’ physical condition, Quality factors. It is suggested that editors should make reasonable arrangements according to the actual situation of manuscripts and the characteristics of experts when selecting reviewers.